This is crucial for sites that host a large amount of images, and could even save you money on your web hosting.
Less media storage-WebP’s enhanced compression also means less storage space. That’s a huge boost to site enjoyment: according to Website Builder Expert, every second delay in loading reduces visitor satisfaction by 16% and one in four visitors will abandon you completely if it’s not loaded in 4 seconds. Faster loading times-Due to the smaller file sizes, pages with WebP images load faster. Impressive as it is, WebP isn’t quite ready to be “the one.” For now, take a look at the WebP pros and cons and see if it’s right for you and your needs. That stellar performance, combined with the vote of confidence from Google, really paves the way for WebP becoming the new default web file format. That’s a big deal because typically you don’t find those features in the same format: before WebP, you’d have to use PNG for transparent backgrounds and GIF for animations, and nothing supported both at the same time. The other main advantage of WebP is its versatility-it incorporates both transparency and animation. For sites that use a lot of images, switching over could make a significant impact and shave valuable milliseconds of loading time, especially on mobile. How much smaller? According to Google’s own data, WebP lossless compression is 26% smaller than PNGs and its lossy compression is 25-34% smaller than JPEGs. That means using WebP images for your own site will (usually) make it run faster and reduce your data storage at the same time. To put it simply, WebP images are usually smaller than their counterparts, but with the same quality, thanks to their superior compression. If you want to know the “magic” of how you can reduce a file’s size without affecting the quality, this guide explains it well. There are two main types of compression: lossless (the image quality stays the same as the data size goes down) and lossy (the image quality goes down slightly as the data size goes down significantly). If you’re unfamiliar with the term, compression refers to encoding the file’s data into fewer bits, or digital data pieces, than the original. But to speed things along in this article, we’ll jump straight to WebP’s main selling point, compression. To truly understand what makes WebP unique, it helps to first understand all the image file formats and their differences. It’s become a popular topic lately as it pulled ahead in the next-gen image format wars: as of this writing, it’s supported on Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Opera and most recently Safari. 
It was first announced back in 2010, and has since been upgrading and improving until its current state. What is WebP?ĭisregarding all the recent buzz, WebP (colloquially pronounced “weppy”) is actually quite old.
#Xnconvert png transparency how to
We’ll explain the WebP pros and cons and then show you how to convert your other image formats. So in this guide, we explain everything you need to know, what it is, how to use it and why you should care. And despite all the convoluted technical details, for anyone who posts pictures online, WebP is a big deal. It’s becoming accepted on more and more devices-much to the chagrin of competitors JPEG 2000 and JPEG XR-and is on track to be the new default web image format. Thanks to its owner Google, the WebP image format has become a hot topic recently. But that only raises more questions, namely “what is WebP?” and “what’s wrong with JPEGs?” Illustration by OrangeCrush We’re talking about the next generation of web image format, and at the moment WebP is pulling ahead. This particular format war involves us all, and chances are you’ve seen its combatants without even knowing. Not the robot-skeletons kind, but the most-accepted format kind, in the vein of Playstation vs Xbox or Betamax vs VHS.
This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by RamConsulting.There’s a tech war going on right under our noses. This is higher than max-quality, so using max-quality instead (80)įixing corrupt webp by adding a zero byte (older versions of Gd had a bug, but this hack fixes it)Ĭonverted image in 15 ms, reducing file size with 73% (went from 28 kb to 8 kb) The following options were supplied but are ignored because they are not supported by this converter: The following options have not been explicitly set, so using the following defaults: Note: it is the resulting options after merging down the "jpeg" and "png" options and any converter-prefixed options. The following options have been set explicitly. Server software: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) Below is the log (GD Version: 2.1.1) : Converter set to: gd
0 kommentar(er)
